Wednesday, February 25, 2015

LomoKino Super 35mm Camera Review

I’ve been excited about the Lomokino since I first heard of them from their crowdfunding campaign. Admittedly, I forgot about it for a while. But recently I saw it on Amazon, and decided to pick one up.
The Lomokino is a hand cranked Super 35mm movie camera that takes traditional 35mm still camera rolls of film. As anyone who knows me can attest, I am a film nut. So the thought of being able to shoot super 35mm motion pictures, and develop it at home was exceptionally intriguing.
To be honest, the Lomokino was probably designed to be a quirky toy for hipsters. A way to shoot “old style” movie clips. However, I see much more potential in this little device. A 35mm movie frame has a left to right. Grain to pixel equivalent of about a 30 megapixel digital camera. However, the average film stock has 10 layers of emulsion deep. Making a 35mm movie frame closer to the equivalent of a 350 megapixel digital camera. (4k video is approximately equivalent to 5 megapixels). This doesn’t even begin to account for the subtle organic flow of film grain as opposed to the harsh uniformity of digital pixels. Film is a far better (although far more expensive) medium. Although I have fully embraced digital as a cost effective substitute for film, shooting film is still better.
However, the Lomokino does have some serious disadvantages. First, is the cranking mechanism. The lomokino will shoot 5 frames per second if cranked rigorously.  This slow frame rate closer resembles a flip book then a movie. Stylistic qualities aside, I would like to see a version that can shoot 15 frames per second. This would allow it to reach persistence of vision, and make for a much smoother end product. I understand the manufacturers reasoning behind the slow frame rate. 5 frames per second gives the user about 30 seconds of footage from a 36 exposure roll of still film. 15 frames per second would only yield 10 seconds. Although the average user would probably prefer the extended time to the smoother look, it would be nice to have the option to change it. I have a 35mm Mitchel camera with a hand crank that can be set to shoot 128 frames per second, so I know it is possible to make the Lomokino shoot 15fps…
The lens on the Lomokino is not the best quality. It would have been nicer if this camera came with a standard lens mount instead of a cheapy permanently attached lens. However, it is wide enough of an angle to have a substantial depth of field making it good for the average user.
The first roll of film I shot through the Lomokino was ilford 400 speed B&W film. (I later processed it at home and scanned the negative using a Wolverine 20 megapixel negative scanner) The cranking mechanism wasn’t very fluid which resulted in a lot of camera shake in my finished footage. I will try different ways to hold the camera, and let you guys know what works better.

If you are into film making, celluloid, or a just a trendy hipster wanting to do things the “old-fashioned” way, You should pick up a Lomokino camera. For the professional film and video maker, it is a cheap back up that can get you some striking images when you don’t have power or a charge to your regular devices. For the indie / experimental film maker it is unique style that will set your project apart from the deluge of digital films. And for the film aficionado, it is an inexpensive way to shoot real motion pictures with a tangible roll of film.


Wednesday, January 7, 2015

Canon 24mm EF-S Pancake Review

I recently saw that Canon had released a 24mm EF-S f/1.8 Pancake lens. I was very interested in this lens. I have a full set of Nikon and Canon FD primes, but my EF prime selection is lacking. Seeing that Canon released a low cost, wide-angle “pancake” lens was just the push I needed to expand my EF’s.
The First thing you will probably notice about the Canon 24mm EF-S lens is the slim profile. This is achieved by the use of one aspherical element in the lens' construction, which helps to minimize chromatic aberrations and produce notably sharp images. The slim “pancake” profile of the lens also allows you to use the lens in ways (and places) you cannot with a standard sized lens.
The second thing you will probably notice about the Canon 24mm EF-S lens is the price. At $150.00 it is ¼ the price of the standard Canon 24mm EF lens and is really only lacking in the EF lens’s Image Stabilization.
Once I got my hands on the Canon 24mm EF-S, I took it down to the beach to shoot some photos. I immediately noticed how fast and quiet the auto focus on this lens is. This is the result of Canon’s Stepping motor (which I learned can easily be overridden by turning the manual focus ring without needing to switch the lens to manual focus).
The photos came out sharp and very nice. This gave me an idea, and I quickly rushed of to do a comparison between the Canon 24mm EF-S and my other 24mm prime lenses (a Nikon Nikkor 24mm, and a Canon 24mm L-series FD).  To use the other lenses on my Canon T2I, I use fotodiox adapters. The one for the FD adds a piece of glass that cuts light and a bit of sharpness as well as increasing the focal length a bit (although that never stopped the L-series 24mm from being one of my favorite lenses).
Below I have added a photo from each of the three lenses, and as you can see, the Canon 24mm EF-S Pancake holds up surprisingly well against it’s more expensive partners.


Another great advantage of the Canon 24mm EF-S lens is it's great macro abilities. Canon claims the ability of this lens to focus on object about 6 inches from the lens. This photograph of some sailboat rigging seems to verify that claim. the photo has remarkable color clarity, and sharpness.
Overall, I would have to say that if you shoot with a Canon APS-C camera, the 24mm EF-S lens is good addition to your lens collection. It may, in fact, become my new “goto” wide-angle prime lens.

Have you tried the Canon 24mm EF-S prime lens? If so, tell us what you think in the comments below!